Many scientists attempted to reconcile Newtonian mechanics with the Maxwell theory, the most prominent being Lorentz, Fitzgerald and Poincare. But their efforts were unconvincing, and ultimately unsuccessful. The definitive answer came with Einstein’s work in 1905, where he re-analyzed the nature of space and time. They are not individually absolute and the same for everybody, as Newton had visualized; rather, it is only the combined space-time continuum which is common to all, but each inertial observer divides it up into a space and a time in her own way.This is nonsense. That understanding of space-time comes almost entirely from Lorentz, Fitzgerald, and Poincare, and not Einstein. The paper is not able to give a single example of any aspect of relativity where Einstein's work was superior.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Einstein's miraculous year
The paper Einstein's Miraculous Year, recently put online, has glowing praise for Albert Einstein and adds:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good Wlll Hunting
SciAm reprints an article on Why mathematicians hate Good Will Hunting . With the award ceremony for the Oscars this month, many people are ...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
Peter Woit writes : what’s all this nonsense about Bell’s theorem and supposed non-locality? If I go to the Scholarpedia entry for Bell’s...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
No comments:
Post a Comment