Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No Truth in a Causal Universe
This guy argues that we should not accept any arguments from people who believe in determinism, and reject free will. I agree with this. ...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
Peter Woit writes : what’s all this nonsense about Bell’s theorem and supposed non-locality? If I go to the Scholarpedia entry for Bell’s...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
The above comic is much more funny if you insert the following statement before the speech balloon:
ReplyDelete"After we took several hits of our new experimental highly hybridized marijuana..."
Which is about the only scientific explanation I can come up with as to why so many people doing publicly funded HEP research believe in this tripe. Rule of thumb: If spontaneous anything is required, or some un-measurable substance (i.e. unobtanium, impossibillium, dark matter, dark energy, dark doo-doo, etc.)in order for the theory to function, then DO NOT FUND IT. There, problem solved.
I'm all for Hong Kong: don't let the morons and the government get the money in the first place.
Delete