MIT professor Scott Aaronson is jumping to U Texas Austin, as they are pumping a bunch a money into a new quantum computing center.
I deduce from this that computer scientists think that quantum computing is a hot new area of computer science, with huge advances likely in the next 20 years.
I wonder how long they will be able to continue hyping this subject, without getting results.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Einstein Objecting to using Observables
Einstein's unhappiness with quantum mechanics was already clear in 1926, within a year of the theory being formulated. Heisenberg told ...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
I would not have thought that infinitesimals would be so political, but a book last year says so. It is titled, Infinitesimal: How a Dangero...
-
Some editing is being done on the History of spacetime for the Spacetime Wikipedia. It is funny how some editors want to make it all about ...
I am going to go out on a limb and assume that the computing world which is actually dependent upon working designs is not going to be as patient as the non-producing sections of 'science' whose only output apparently is quantified in the number of published papers and science magazine hype articles.
ReplyDeleteComputer engineers are not going to be amused by vapor-hardware.
What's even MORE interesting is that there is no proof that BQP is not simply a subset of BPP. That is to say, perhaps the exotic(and probably incorrect) quantum processes aren't needed for vastly improved computational power. It simply may be the case that some as of yet undiscovered algorithm (probabalistic) will yield the promised speedups.
ReplyDelete