MIT professor Scott Aaronson is jumping to U Texas Austin, as they are pumping a bunch a money into a new quantum computing center.
I deduce from this that computer scientists think that quantum computing is a hot new area of computer science, with huge advances likely in the next 20 years.
I wonder how long they will be able to continue hyping this subject, without getting results.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How Hard Determinists Reject Free Will
New video : Robert Sapolsky, Paul Bloom, and Lucy Allais debate whether free will exists and what this would mean for punishment and moralit...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
-
I would not have thought that infinitesimals would be so political, but a book last year says so. It is titled, Infinitesimal: How a Dangero...
I am going to go out on a limb and assume that the computing world which is actually dependent upon working designs is not going to be as patient as the non-producing sections of 'science' whose only output apparently is quantified in the number of published papers and science magazine hype articles.
ReplyDeleteComputer engineers are not going to be amused by vapor-hardware.
What's even MORE interesting is that there is no proof that BQP is not simply a subset of BPP. That is to say, perhaps the exotic(and probably incorrect) quantum processes aren't needed for vastly improved computational power. It simply may be the case that some as of yet undiscovered algorithm (probabalistic) will yield the promised speedups.
ReplyDelete