The scientific publisher Nature makes a similar catalog on a slightly more granular level, looking at specific fields of science. According to Nature’s most recent rankings, 18 of the top 25 most productive research institutes in the physical sciences, 19 of the top 20 in geosciences, and a full 25 out of 25 in chemistry are Chinese. Only in the biosciences do American scientists still have a lead—but even on that list three of the top ten are Chinese.6The kicker is, none of that was true even just a decade ago.
Tuesday, March 31, 2026
China has taken over Science
T. Greer argues China is the future of science:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
China has taken over Science
T. Greer argues China is the future of science: The scientific publisher Nature makes a similar catalog on a slightly more granular level, ...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
Peter Woit writes : what’s all this nonsense about Bell’s theorem and supposed non-locality? If I go to the Scholarpedia entry for Bell’s...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
No comments:
Post a Comment