Quantum supremacy is the idea that a quantum computer could compute something much faster than a classical computer. Aaronson's big idea was that a quantum computer could just sample outputs from a complicated quantum random number generator, and that would pass as quantum supremacy if the classical computer could not simulate it efficiently.
That is what Google did two years ago, and Aaronson was the journal referee who approved the claim of quantum supremacy.
Now some Chinese researchers have shown that they can simulate Google's output on a classical computer. Aaronson says the Google team claims that they can keep changing the benchmark until they find one that the Chinese cannot simulate. He does not believe them.
Aaronson does not go as far as saying that Google's quantum supremacy is all a big hoax, but that's what I get out of his post. Read it yourself.
I am waiting for the quantum computers to compute something that is demonstrably difficult. That has not happened, and may never happen.
Bullshit is as bullshit does. If you invent a handy dandy magical computer, please just shut up, and just demonstrate the damn thing doing something remotely useful or outright impressive. Show, don't tell. Presently, Quantum computing is nothing but 'tell', from top to bottom. They still aren't remotely close to doing anything useful with it...besides getting themselves paid a lot of money year after year without observable results.ReplyDelete
And remember that their idea of "supremacy" is just to reaffirm that quantum mechanics is hard to compute. It says nothing about any meaningful idea of supremacy.Delete