- Einstein rejected relativity geometrization
- Equivalence between Lorentz and Einstein
- Einstein agreed with Lorentz
- Relativity principle and covariance
- Einstein borrowed from Lorentz
- Minkowski conclusions independent of Einstein
- Grossmann's help on general relativity
- Poincare recommended Lorentz for Nobel
- Albert Einstein's Methodology (rely on friends but not credit them)
- How Lorentz arrived at the deformation hypothesis
- Different explanations for the length contraction
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Einstein book update
If you bought my book, How Einstein Ruined Physics, then check out this blog for updated info. In particular, there has been some new scholarly work on Einstein, and nearly all of it supports the thesis of the book. See:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Einstein Objecting to using Observables
Einstein's unhappiness with quantum mechanics was already clear in 1926, within a year of the theory being formulated. Heisenberg told ...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
I would not have thought that infinitesimals would be so political, but a book last year says so. It is titled, Infinitesimal: How a Dangero...
-
Some editing is being done on the History of spacetime for the Spacetime Wikipedia. It is funny how some editors want to make it all about ...
HI. I'm reading your book now. I wonder who has published any criticism of it. I find it very excellent, and I suppose it is truer than the accepted history. I am very skeptical of relativity itself and not so concerned about the historical account as about steel manning the science to criticize it. Your book is really helpful.
ReplyDeleteHave you read the article by Peter Hayes on relativity functioning as an ideology? This would go a long way towards explaining the lack of a response to your book by critics. "The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox." Ideologies will tend to defend themselves by censorious tactics.
ReplyDelete