Robert Crease, a philosopher and historian of science at Stony Brook University in New York, agrees. "Historians often say that, had there been no Einstein, the community would have converged on special relativity shortly", he says. "Events were pushing them kicking and screaming in that direction." Boughn and Rothman's work, he says, shows that Hasenöhrl was among those headed this way. ...Yes it was inconsistent. All the other relativity papers cite their sources. Einstein is the exception. And the problem is not just that he failed to cite sources in his original paper; he gave interviews and wrote articles all his life telling how he discovered relativity, and always refused to credit his sources.
Did Einstein know of Hasenöhrl's work? "I can't prove it, but I am reasonably certain that Einstein must have done, and just decided to do it better", says Rothman. But failure to cite it was not inconsistent with the conventions of the time.
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
Origin of Einstein's famous formula
I mentioned below a new paper on E=mc2 before Einstein. PhysicsWorld now reports on it:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Susskind says Universe is not Real
Another respected physicist has gone off the deep end. In a new video : Why the Universe Is Not Real | Leonard Susskind At first glance, t...
-
I have occasionally argued that Bell's Theorem has been wildly misinterpreted, and that it doesn't prove nonlocality or anything in...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
-
Peter Woit writes : what’s all this nonsense about Bell’s theorem and supposed non-locality? If I go to the Scholarpedia entry for Bell’s...
No comments:
Post a Comment