MIT professor Scott Aaronson is jumping to U Texas Austin, as they are pumping a bunch a money into a new quantum computing center.
I deduce from this that computer scientists think that quantum computing is a hot new area of computer science, with huge advances likely in the next 20 years.
I wonder how long they will be able to continue hyping this subject, without getting results.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Explanation of Newtonian Time
Matt Farr posted a new paper on Time in Classical Physics : Wigner (1995, 334) describes how Newton’s “most important” achievement was the ...
-
Dr. Bee's latest video is on Schroedinger's Cat, and she concludes: What this means is that one of the following three assumptions ...
-
A commenter disputes my contention that Bell's Theorem depends on an assumption of local hidden variables. This may seem like an obsc...
-
I mentioned 'tHooft's new paper on superdeterminism , and now Woit links to an email debate between 'tHooft and philosopher of...
I am going to go out on a limb and assume that the computing world which is actually dependent upon working designs is not going to be as patient as the non-producing sections of 'science' whose only output apparently is quantified in the number of published papers and science magazine hype articles.
ReplyDeleteComputer engineers are not going to be amused by vapor-hardware.
What's even MORE interesting is that there is no proof that BQP is not simply a subset of BPP. That is to say, perhaps the exotic(and probably incorrect) quantum processes aren't needed for vastly improved computational power. It simply may be the case that some as of yet undiscovered algorithm (probabalistic) will yield the promised speedups.
ReplyDelete