tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post8913029524536452009..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: SciAm Complains that Students are SkepticsRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-19242344893077534582022-01-29T02:34:56.473-08:002022-01-29T02:34:56.473-08:00Roger,
People have good reason to be skeptical, as...Roger,<br />People have good reason to be skeptical, as they ALWAYS should be. It is embarrassing to hear politicians and scientists complain about how folks don't trust them even as they spin narratives that change constantly as they attempt to cover their own asses. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, which means you can't tune out and leave those who seek power unsupervised and unquestioned.<br /><br />1.)<br />Dr. Fauci has lied repeatedly about his involvement with forced gain research to congress directly, and the part he played in there even being a Covid 19 virus to begin with. Anyone that has questioned anything this man has said has been vilified as 'anti science' and 'misinformation' by both the scientific establishment and the main stream media. <br /><br />2.) <br />Early on, Dr. Fauci was informed by a number of virologists that Covid 19 has very strange characteristics for a natural disease, and that there were multiple indicators that the disease may have been engineered. The very same virologists suddenly did a 180 on this position, and several months later were the recipients of multi million dollar grants. Nothing to see here...?<br /><br />3.)<br />As I have stated on multiple occasions, scientists are just people, and aren't more inherently honest, pure, ethical, or even competent. A skilled profession does not grant ANYONE virtue or good character. No one would ever say that their plumber, electrician, or garbage man was more 'trustworthy' because of their trade.<br /><br /> If scientists want blind faith and unwavering trust in their claims, political positions, and actions, they should quit calling themselves scientists and start calling themselves activists, priests, and politicians.<br /><br /> As of late, The scientific community is largely convinced that they must present a lockstep consensus publicly, while only behind closed doors do they honestly admit their disagreement and uncertainty. This has got to stop. If you can't be honest and transparent about process, you can't be trusted to do science, especially on the taxpayer dime. CFTnoreply@blogger.com