tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post8808316476779523164..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Carroll explains many-worlds to philosopherRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-55334489920188139052015-07-22T00:20:01.290-07:002015-07-22T00:20:01.290-07:00You have a bee in your bonnet about "philosop...You have a bee in your bonnet about "philosophers". <br />1. Have you forgotten Ayn Rand? Everyone's a philosopher. <br />2. You say philosophers misconstrue QC. Then you show us one of them, Carroll, but introduce him as a physicist rather than s philosopher. <br /><br />Seems to me that a better intro would run like "Here is a physicist who fails to grasp the philosophical ramifications of QC." Unless your position is that all philosophy is either established physics or worthless, in which case you abandon Rand.Jon Burdickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02548776058585897717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-34215187806121083372015-07-22T00:19:26.784-07:002015-07-22T00:19:26.784-07:00You have a bee in your bonnet about "philosop...You have a bee in your bonnet about "philosophers". <br />1. Have you forgotten Ayn Rand? Everyone's a philosopher. <br />2. You say philosophers misconstrue QC. Then you show us one of them, Carroll, but introduce him as a physicist rather than s philosopher. <br /><br />Seems to me that a better intro would run like "Here is a physicist who fails to grasp the philosophical ramifications of QC." Unless your position is that all philosophy is either established physics or worthless, in which case you abandon Rand.Jon Burdickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02548776058585897717noreply@blogger.com