tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post6877349615861850325..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Video on Bell's TheoremRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-42205340761947328742017-09-18T07:57:54.142-07:002017-09-18T07:57:54.142-07:00Wave like properties...is not a wave. It is someth...Wave like properties...is not a wave. It is something that has some properties of a wave, but clearly by observation not all, or you would just call it a wave and have done with it. Many things in reality can have wave like properties in aggregate movement, like the stock market, water/air molecules, matter, yet no one would be silly enough to say there was nothing there but waves. Same for any other kind of wave, a wave of WHAT? Oscillating amplitudes don't float around without being anchored to something actual, or it's just abstraction. Let's not butcher photons into meaningless reductionist goo by denying that they still have un-wave like 'particle' properties too.CFTnoreply@blogger.com