tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post4302961701792307534..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Philosopher disses black hole paradoxRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-23438479013247278532017-05-14T01:51:12.371-07:002017-05-14T01:51:12.371-07:00Black holes should be renamed 'information hol...Black holes should be renamed 'information holes'. We have no way of knowing if they actually function as theorized because black hole theory depends upon an abstraction called a point or singularity magically given the ability to carry mass without physical extension (volume)...which even the imagined Higgs Boson can't do. There is no physical way for this to be possible, and even if you wish to speculate, you couldn't ever measure it. Physicists loves black holes because they can publish papers about them without fear of being contradicted, not because they can actually locate, examine, and test them.<br />Very little credit should be given for publishing papers on untestable entities based on unphysical abstractions which are little more than sloppy thought experiments.CFTnoreply@blogger.com