tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post3068683593988266157..comments2021-09-10T12:52:48.773-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Hawking flips on black holesRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-66006019015087607212014-01-28T07:09:24.316-08:002014-01-28T07:09:24.316-08:00I haven't been through that part yet. I have j...I haven't been through that part yet. I have just been through the part which shows that there are no black holes, because the original Schwarzschild solution (not Hilbert's modification) says so. What I don't understand is why none of the experts acknowledged this obvious fact.Craignoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-21804638179596041902014-01-28T01:36:51.310-08:002014-01-28T01:36:51.310-08:00It's as if Hawking got sucked into a Black Hol...It's as if Hawking got sucked into a Black Hole of Calcutta, and came out an other end athwart where he hit the event horizon.Jon Burdickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02548776058585897717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-78640609924447537102014-01-27T15:31:17.074-08:002014-01-27T15:31:17.074-08:00Craig,
I have watched the same dialogue, and I hav...Craig,<br />I have watched the same dialogue, and I have asked several physicists without an honest answer that does not revolve bluster or deflection: Are the equations that contain the black hole in relativity non linear or not? If they are non linear, what Hawking and pretty much most of physics community has done with black holes is pure hokum. The model contains no matter or energy, only an imaginary mass contained in a singularity of zero size, nothing else exists in this model to interact with, and is asymptotically flat (no curvature means this model is not compatible with the Big Bang model which requires spatial curvature). Also, what the hell does "outside a body" mean in relation to a purely abstract geometric (not physical) postulate called a 'point' or singularity which by any definition does not have any physical extension to attach size(volume) or mass to? What is outside of a zero sized body? Good Grief, did anyone pass basic geometry? If a size-less abstraction can be assigned mass without a volume to depend it from, why the hell do you need volume to calculate density to determine mass with? Just think about the arithmetic for a moment, a point is of zero size. M=DV. What happens to M if V is zero? Ok, D=M/V, what happens if V is zero? Oh yeah, geez, I forgot, if you are a famous name in physics, arithmetic does not apply to you, nor common sense or logic apparently.C.Takacsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-9441535349555751552014-01-27T08:12:42.436-08:002014-01-27T08:12:42.436-08:00Stephen Crothers has been saying that there are no...Stephen Crothers has been saying that there are no black holes all along: http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/Craignoreply@blogger.com