tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post2340133238830948279..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Reductionism is firmly establishedRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-67678905878539841022020-04-13T20:39:14.891-07:002020-04-13T20:39:14.891-07:00When you are using crappy Rutherford models as a b...When you are using crappy Rutherford models as a basis for your chemistry accounting of atom mechanics, no wonder there are problems. I will not entertain electron probability cloud nonsense either, as probabilities only exist in math calculations, they have no material presence and can carry no forces. <br /><br />Electrons in halo like shells/bonding crap? Really? Do you think atoms are actually mechanically structured this way? Just look at the mass of a single electron compared to a single proton, 1/1836. Do you honestly think something 1/1836 the mass of a single proton is capable of bonding one far more massive atom to another? Only if you believe in magic. Atoms have internal structures that constantly move, this requires constant energy (they sure aren't consuming their own mass), so ask yourself how much energy would be required (you might be surprised), and how this energy would even enter the atomic structure. Figure that out, you might have a good candidate of what could hold atomic structures together. <br /><br /> <br /> When electrons were first incorporated into atomic structures, they were granted all sorts of magical powers to fill in for all sorts of data holes in working theory. Not much has changed today where theorists constantly rely on incredibly murky things like 'quantum (fill in the blank ad nausea)' to explain anything they actually can't.CFTnoreply@blogger.com