tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post1232048320844093146..comments2021-06-23T17:50:03.204-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Poincare searched for symmetry-invariant lawsRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-17641438216821711772015-03-11T11:40:32.142-07:002015-03-11T11:40:32.142-07:00Something that should be said there is NO NULL RES...Something that should be said there is NO NULL RESULT in the Michelson and Morley experiment. They didn't get a zero result. They didn't get what they expected but they didn't get zero as is FALSELY reported over and over and over. They expected to get 30 km/s and got I think 8 km/s. I've read the M and M report myself. This has been tested many, many times for years and there was some smaller number present. For some reason this is completely ignored. Look at the wikipedia page.<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment<br /><br />Go down to "Subsequent experiments", They say,"... Morley was not convinced of his own results, and went on to conduct additional experiments with Dayton Miller from 1902 to 1904. Again, the result was negative within the margins of error...."<br /><br />This is a lie. Miller got 10 km/s where they expected 30 km/s. This is hardly a small error. Dayton Miller did years worth of testing and never got a zero/null result. Miller fended off the null result people while he was alive but for some reason they have taken over now and it's in all the text books. An interesting fact is the difference in speed was influenced by the planets position.<br /><br />Wiki says no one could replicate his results but that's not true. There was a naval laboratory scientist that replicated the results with microwaves. Notice also that they say no one can replicate the result of some frequency shift but Michelson-Morley themselves had a frequency shift. So they did replicate the result. The last test of this I heard of was done in a mineshaft and got a null result. This only means that ether (or whatever) can't effect light in a mine shaft. Meaningless. I read about this in an article by G. Harry Stine the former Science Fact editor of Analog SciFi and Sci Fact.Samnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-39916947051383974382015-03-06T09:43:01.814-08:002015-03-06T09:43:01.814-08:00"The preferred mathematical view of special r..."The preferred mathematical view of special relativity is that of non-Euclidean geometry."<br /><br /> Non-Euclidean geometry does not replace Euclidean geometry at any time, Non-Euclidean geometry is in FACT utterly dependent upon Euclidean geometry. If Euclidean geometry were false, Non Euclidean geometry would be invalid, whereas if Non Euclidean geometry were proven false, it would have no bearing on the validity of Euclidean geometry.<br /><br /> All dependencies aside, non-Euclidean geometry is used to cloak, not reveal the inner workings of special relativity, as it buries the mechanics and needlessly complicates the math for the purposes of misdirection and gatekeeping. I have no patience with hierophants who use complexity to hide from scrutiny and criticism. When your objective is to deceive and conceal, no wonder people do not understand what you say.CFTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-84652055230636776662015-03-05T20:00:06.081-08:002015-03-05T20:00:06.081-08:00Einstein surely must be the #1 communist.Einstein surely must be the #1 communist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-9202663904812375992015-03-05T19:47:01.766-08:002015-03-05T19:47:01.766-08:00Here is my on-topic comment: that useless paper i...Here is my on-topic comment: that useless paper is nothing more than a plug for a useless branch of math called category theory.<br /><br />The modern day intellectual "giants" that Roger so admires are directly responsible for this:<br /><br />http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-Areva-plans-to-cut-costs-by-2017-04031501.html<br /><br />Areva plans to cut costs by $1.1 billion by 2017<br /><br />------------------------------------------<br /><br />Fire skilled labor and hire more "super geniuses" (read mathematicians who don't know shit about physics). Eventually the lights go off and France lives in the dark ages once again. This isn't unique to France, btw. The USA nuclear industry is already toast.<br /><br />All those idiots who are running to the universities to be "enlightened" (read get their union card) are finding out the hard way that those intellectual sewers are filled up with the likes of Coyne. Many of them don't even bother attending the lectures. <br /><br />Ahh, funny fiat money....the death of science.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-43977830767444408262015-03-05T14:59:20.505-08:002015-03-05T14:59:20.505-08:00Pretty much everything physicists say about the hi...Pretty much everything physicists say about the history of their subject or science in general is wrong. No matter how simple or commonplace the claim is about the history of science, if a physicists makes it, it's almost certainly wrong.<br /><br />I remember being told repeatedly over the years by physicists the story about Maxwell's amazing discovery of electromagnetic waves. He boldly added the displacement current to his equations and out popped a wave equation whose speed was just that of light.<br /><br />The reality the basic idea dated back to Faraday at least, and the equation relating the speed of light to the electric and magnetic constants was discovered over a decade previously by Weber using a competing version of EM now considered defunct.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-72295985556904832542015-03-05T12:34:56.472-08:002015-03-05T12:34:56.472-08:00They study symmetry because mathematics lacks expr...They study symmetry because mathematics lacks expressive or comprehensible ways of dealing with complicated asymmetry. Quite circular.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com