tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post8132509171621410165..comments2024-03-27T19:47:13.475-07:00Comments on Dark Buzz: Tegmark annoys the angry atheistsRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-27208987789409546552013-06-30T17:26:28.538-07:002013-06-30T17:26:28.538-07:00The fine tuning of the universe is data not supers...The fine tuning of the universe is data not superstition. It points directly to a designer--so much so that atheists have latched on to a comic book explanation of an infinite universe maker machine.<br />So these attempts at ridicule just appear desperate. Scientific data that was suppose to prove the world only "appears" designed has done exactly the opposite to monumental degrees--120 places to the right of the decimal point--confirming what most of the humans who have ever lived throughout history have believed.You can call that superstition--but I call it NORMAL.<br /><br /> It must hurt to not see something that all other humans have--in all of 3 seconds--but hiding behind the atheist company line is not an argument...its the actions of a drone.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05962728791028559532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-29315822255848196922013-03-18T02:21:32.735-07:002013-03-18T02:21:32.735-07:00"Once a belief system has been set up all Tru..."Once a belief system has been set up all Truth is then derived from that belief system and therefore it follows that everything else that contradicts this belief system is either false or has not been properly elucidated under the existing belief system. Most scientists believe that there is an underlying reality that is true for the entire Universe. The problem with this is that everybody has a different perception as to what this reality is which is based upon their own belief system." <br /><br />Just trotting this out to show you can find your philosophy of science even on martial arts web sites. (it was lifted from the Shadowhand Taijiquan site). <br /><br />As Rog has pointed out, "consensus is the lowest form of truth-verification", something like that. Science is based on achieving consensus -- hmm, isn't that politics? -- and as the Taijiquan master assizes, everyone sees things differently. He refers to it as "the" problem, so I run with that as follows. Assuming a physicist does someday drum up a perfect GUT theory he or she may find the arduousness of that exercise trivial as compared to reeducating even one fellow scientist as to its correctness. Paraphrasing Ayn Rand: "In order for their to be one great man there needs to be two great men, the second one being he who is able to understand what the first one has accomplished."Jon Burdickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02548776058585897717noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-35167146408923291042013-02-22T09:55:31.930-08:002013-02-22T09:55:31.930-08:00Belief in superstitions is never supportive of sci...Belief in superstitions is never supportive of science.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com