tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post8061532682372540626..comments2019-01-16T20:24:22.451-08:00Comments on Dark Buzz: The math of the standard modelRogerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03474078324293158376noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8148573551417578681.post-13256171544072840332018-12-24T21:16:35.103-08:002018-12-24T21:16:35.103-08:00Ah, the Standard Model...a model so complete it on...Ah, the Standard Model...a model so complete it only has no accounting whatsoever of gravity, mass, time, or inertia...in other words, it can't actually do physics involving anything that moves...which seems to be most of the observable universe. <br /><br /> Just a few loose ends to be tidied up, and them I'm sure we will know everything. /s <br /><br /> Renormalization is where things seriously went wrong, it's what happens when you pretend you can get agreement with observation by truncating your equation's infinities into finite quantities because... you waved your hands very vigorously and spoke convincingly, and have been getting away with it for decades...according to Richard Feynman.<br /><br /> "The shell game that we play to find n and j is technically called renormalization. But no matter how clever the word, it is what I would call a dippy process! Having to resort to such hocus-pocus has prevented us from proving the theory of quantum electrodynamics is mathematically self-consistent. .... I suspect that renormalization is not mathematically legitimate."<br /><br />Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/renormalization-a-dippy-process-r-feynman.235191/<br />CFTnoreply@blogger.com